Sign the petition against SOPA & PIPA Today! https://www.google.com/landing/takeaction/
Sign the petition against SOPA & PIPA Today! https://www.google.com/landing/takeaction/
I am a big believer in plan, plan and plan some more. Regardless of the situation you should have back up plans. Some people inherently are able to think quickly on their feet. Others, however, struggle to know what to do next when plan A goes awry.
In my tradeshow management days, I realized quickly that not all employees have the problem solving skills they need to be strong team members. This didn’t mean they weren’t good at their job, they just weren’t trained to respond quickly to problems. To combat this issue, I developed a training program to help flex their critical thinking muscles. (Download your free copy of This is a Test to help you proactively manage trade show calamity)
Training is also critical to crisis communication. In crisis communication, anticipating a crisis is a large part of the crisis team’s responsibility. In order to ensure that the organization is protected, and the stakeholders and community are communicated with effectively, you have to create contingencies and form a game plan using scenarios. Companies typically have a generic crisis communication strategy in place. This is a great start, but I believe that you need specific crisis communication scenario plans that enable you and the crisis team to quickly mount an offense without hashing out how the generic plan doesn’t fit the current circumstances.
Once you have some specific crisis communication scenario plans in place, then you can create training and simulations around the scenario to help the crisis team learn how to respond and think quickly on their feet. There is a reason theater performances always have a dress rehearsal. It is because of Murphy’s Law, “What can go wrong will go wrong.”
Below are some strategies for developing a scenario based training program for your crisis communication team. Creating training simulations will allow everyone to be on the same page, employ similar tactics and allow the team to manage the crisis instead of the crisis managing them.
How to Develop Crisis Communication Training Simulations
Read More in the Crisis Communication Series:
In the end, creating the message on this project was much simpler than the actual execution. I was able to easily story board my ideas and create copy/content. The much longer process was crafting the original content and then making it web presentable. In the end I needed over seven different tools in order to finalize a fairly simple digital media message. The take away is that it takes a lot of skill and digital savvy to create a message that can function simultaneously as a window and a mirror. I believe that the knowledge and critical thinking skills needed to use digital tools will begin to define what people can accomplish in the future. For a full list of the tools I used to create this digital experiment see below.
References:
Bolter, J., Gromala, D. (2005) Windows and Mirrors: Interaction Design, Digital Art, and the Myth of Transparency. Cambridge, MA.
October 25, 2011 Condoleezza Rice, former Secretary of State, spoke at Bluementhal Performing Arts Center in Charlotte, NC as part of Queens University’s Leadership Series. She describes, quite eloquently, a moment during 9/11 after the third plane hit the Pentagon. President George W. Bush told Condoleezza Rice that he was coming back to Washington. Rice explained it was the only time she ever spoke firmly to the President saying, “You stay where you are. We are under attack.”
Rice’s account of 911 brings up an excellent point about crisis management. There are times during a crisis that the leader is going to have a difficult time stepping back from the situation and seeing what is best for the company, organization or country.
When in crisis it is important to think clearly, quickly and effectively plan ahead for multiple types of occurrences. I know that I have even had to sell crisis to my executives in order for them to understand the magnitude.
Although Rice did not divulge the rest of her conversation with the President it is plausible to think that she presented the problem for Bush by explaining that due to the level of attacks and the targets he, and therefore the perception of the US, was in danger. This technique of presentation is called framing. By framing the crisis in this manner, Rice was able to sell Bush on the idea that DC was not the place for him to be because of the terrorist attacks.
If we could speculate, I would also suggest that she followed up by explaining the importance of him being able to remain in command during this difficult time. She probably went so far as to describe the uncertainty of when and where other attacks would occur and the immediate need to evacuate all major buildings in Washington, DC. By providing the dimensions of the crisis in this manner she was able to sell the appropriate course of action to the President; despite it potentially hindering his effectiveness. In doing so Rice aided in preserving the perception that our country would prevail even in time of great and significant crisis.
In order to ensure that crisis are managed effectively are there ever times where you had to be firm with your executives? Perhaps, you have even had to sell your executives on a crisis? Please share…
Read More in the Crisis Communication Series:
Crisis communication is an amazing phenomenon. Just turn on the news or open a web page and we are bombarded with business crisis. From Netflix loosing 800,000 members to the European debt crisis. Nothing sells newspapers like the world is ending headlines. The reality is that not all of the crisis news we read is really a crisis. So what are the crisis that shocked you the most this year? Take the poll, or write in your own answer.
Read More in the Crisis Communication Series:
Never has the changing Charlotte landscape been more noticeable. The 2nd largest banking city in the country has been refaced with red and gold. Last week all of the Wachovia signs were removed and replaced with the very bright red and gold of Wells Fargo.
This poses a question for me. Is Charlotte under an identity crisis? I never realized how the calm of Wachovia’s blue and green so highlighted our cities personality. A combination of First Union and Wachovia, both North Carolina based banks; there was a rich heritage that existed that is now lacking. Not to seem melodramatic, but I feel lost. Just walk in Uptown Charlotte any day or night and the whole area has a different feel. Wells Fargo’s yellow and red clash with the beautiful architectures and intermingle with Bank of America’s red and blue. I even have to do a double take when I approach and ATM.
I don’t think I am alone in this feeling. Many people have commented that they are leaving Wells Fargo, or that they hate the “new” brand. Interestingly, most of the naysayers are local to the area.
In reflecting on these issues as a Wells Fargo customer, it makes me wonder if they did their crisis due diligence. Did they think about corporate social responsibility and how these changes would impact the Charlotte community?
Corporate social responsibility states that citizens of a community expect four key things from the companies that share their space:
Wells Fargo spent two years transitioning the brand. They slowly transitioned the name by adding a division of under the original logo. Additionally, Charlotte was the last market they transitioned. Finally, they over communicated that the change was occurring to all customers. However, I think they underestimated the graphical power that a brand possesses and what those symbols mean to people in a city or region.
I don’t think there was a good way to change the logo and brand elements. Perhaps Wells Fargo recognized that it was impossible to retain the level of corporate social responsibility Charlotte was accustomed to from Wachovia. Charlotteans would naturally feel a sense of loss. Wachovia was a major company; an entity intertwined into the fabric of Charlotte’s society. Therefore, transitioning slowing could have been Well’s way of losing the least (‘Learning to Lose the Least’ – Important, But Difficult Lesson for Organizations). My only question is did they even think about how the brand changes would impact the city and did they strategically review the potential for crisis?
Have you thought about how graphics or logo changes could affect your society, employees, or other external stakeholders? Comments always appreciated!
*picture credit: http://sanatogapost.com/2010/12/05/wachovia-change-to-wells-fargo-coming-quickly/
*Corporate social responsibility information taken from an interview with Dr. John McArthur in October of 2011.
Read More in the Crisis Communication Series: